Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+WSPR\-15\s+on\s+137\.610\s+kHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+WSPR\-15\s+on\s+137\.610\s+kHz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: WSPR-15 on 137.610 kHz (score: 1): Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:12:26 +0200; Hi All Outstanding sigal on LF band Stefan ... and my first copy on this band for me ! Best -5dB in WSPR-15 at 01:00 UTC Seems like WSPR-15 can deal with the severe QRN I have from the motor variator; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00036.html (11,177 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: WSPR-15 on 137.610 kHz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:57:57 +0200; Oooh, hello Luis, LF :-) I didn't know you are already here on the reflector :-) I just sometimes told about the man with the 90m high antenna :-) Just wrote you a personal mail before i saw that one; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00148.html (21,897 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: WSPR-15 on 137.610 kHz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 12:13:16 +0200; Hi again, Sri, i didn't read your email completely before answering. So the vertical dipole works very well! And if you're already using ARGO, i.e. getting spectrograms, maybe the TX-active LF statio; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00149.html (12,741 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: WSPR-15 on 137.610 kHz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 09:09:43 -0400 (EDT); Also thanks to W1TAG for the best DX. -42 dB, that's the lowest SNR i've ever seen in WSPR-15 :-) Stefan, My pleasure! Actually, I think the low SNR had more to do with local electrical noise than an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00150.html (9,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]