Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Rugby\s+Loran\s+station\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Rugby\s+Loran\s+station\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Rugby Loran station (score: 1): Author: "james moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:23:54 +0100; Dear LF Group, Dear old BT seem to have it in for LF amateurs - after all, it appears it was they who operated the 73.25kHz "grinder", which made operation on 73k so much more difficult. I spent some; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00020.html (10,886 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Rugby Loran station (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:36:24 EST; In a message dated 02/11/2004 12:24:00 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: I don't think a Loran station in the central UK would be a total disaster for LF; you could still use narrow-b; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00021.html (9,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]