Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+now\s+a\s+new\s+RX\s+antenna\s+on\s+MF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+now\s+a\s+new\s+RX\s+antenna\s+on\s+MF\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:03:44 +0200; Hello André, I believe S/N reports are realistic in any BW if you are telling the BW at which the SNR has been measured. Unfortunately in many S/N reports the associated BW is missing. and therefore; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00046.html (14,105 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:55:08 +0200; Hello Clemens, E.g., if your FFT is set to a bin width of say 5Hz and a carrier lies 20dB over the DANL (displayed average noise level) it will have a SNR of zero dB in a 500Hz "IF"-bandwidth and the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00047.html (12,221 bytes)
3. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:48:58 +0200; Hi Roeloff, while 0dB SNR referenced to the RX BW is commonly defined as the "minimum discernible signal" I agree with you that with the listening skills of an experienced operator and low cw speed 1; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00049.html (13,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]