Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+jason\s+etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+jason\s+etc\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Re: Re: jason etc (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:08:48 -0600; Be careful Mal, those are fightin words over here. I wish you luck. http://www.we0h.us/lf feet active type antennas. Just curious -- since the signal to noise ratio in my receiving installation appea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00187.html (11,047 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: jason etc (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:19:23 -0500; Mal, The only loop worth while is a full wave loop at the frequency of operation, the smaller you get in relation to natural resonance the less the capture ability and more critical the tuning, and g; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00197.html (9,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]