Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+G0MRF\s+300w\s+Tx\s+\&\s+DDS\s+VFO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+G0MRF\s+300w\s+Tx\s+\&\s+DDS\s+VFO\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Re: G0MRF 300w Tx & DDS VFO (score: 1): Author: "G4WGT - Gary" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:02:30 +0100; Hi Alan & LF, Thanks for the advise, but I did realise that the input is x2 ie. 274 Khz, it's just that when testing the DDS VFO with the scope on the bench I did the checks at those freq's mentioned; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00109.html (10,273 bytes)
2. RE: LF: RE: Re: Re: G0MRF 300w Tx & DDS VFO (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:26:07 +0100; Dear Rik, Gary, LF Group, If that is the case there is no need to get a nice sine (through a LPF and bufferamplifier), most convenient is to pick up the 274kHz signal somewhere at TLL or CMOS level.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00125.html (10,272 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: Re: Re: G0MRF 300w Tx & DDS VFO (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:34:36 +0100; Hello Gary, Thanks for the advise, but I did realise that the input is x2 ie. 274 Khz, ... based on the fact that you need the double frequency I assume that you want to drive a class-D PA push-pull; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00163.html (9,991 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]