Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+R\:\s+Loop\s+Conductors\s+and\s+proximity\s+effect\s+Rdc\s+Rac\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+R\:\s+Loop\s+Conductors\s+and\s+proximity\s+effect\s+Rdc\s+Rac\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac (score: 1): Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:28:38 -0500; Cesare, Thank you for your timely proximity equation! I calculate the spacing required to keep the proximity loss at 10% for two #12 ga (2.0 mm) copper conductors to be 0.5 inches. The spacing requir; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00127.html (11,287 bytes)
2. LF: Re: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac (score: 1): Author: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:56:36 +0100; Reff / Rrf = 1 + (q - 1) * SQR (( p - 1 ) / p ) This info is interesting! Question: Is SQR "squared" or "square root" ? In some programming languages SQR (X) = X^0.5, in others SQR (X) = X^2 while S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00136.html (8,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]