Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+PI4VPO\/Lt\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+PI4VPO\/Lt\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: PI4VPO/Lt (score: 1): Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:40:46 +0200; Greetings all, As Dave wrote... BTW I just heard them giving DK4U a 339 report :-( .... Confirmed, it was a bit tough to work PI4VPO this morning in regular CW (from DK4U) but at least it worked. Gue; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-08/msg00176.html (9,473 bytes)
2. LF: RE: PI4VPO/Lt (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:27:08 +0100; Dick, LF Group. I copied your QSO with PI4VPO/Lt. Their report was 559 using a W&G SPM-30. The PI4VPO signal was about 10dB above the noise. I found that their CW was a little too fast for the 27Hz b; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-08/msg00177.html (9,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]