Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Opera\s+weak\s+signal\s+Rx\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Opera\s+weak\s+signal\s+Rx\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:06:21 +0100; Gary, in the little test I did earlier today (sending only the last 96 bits) I noticed that Opera reported -38dB while the real SNR was about +15dB. I assume that the SNR value gets wrong as a part o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00194.html (12,006 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:18:35 +0000; Isn't -41dB about right for OP32? 8.192 seconds per symbol, = 0.122Hz, = 43dB down on 2500Hz. So +2dB on Noise bandwidth. Couple of dB low perhaps, but not far out 'jnt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00226.html (10,677 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx (score: 1): Author: "Gary G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:41:50 +0100; Hi Andy & Rik, This is apparently the limit for Op32, it is the weakest report I have seen never mind received so it deserved some recognition. Thanks for comments from both of you. 73, Gary - G4WGT.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00534.html (10,464 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:56:17 +0100; Dear Gary, Andy, LF Group, Isn't -41dB about right for OP32? 8.192 seconds per symbol, = 0.122Hz, = 43dB down on 2500Hz. It would also be consistent with the reports showing Op4 decoding consistently; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00592.html (10,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]