To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:39:45 -0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1328218776; bh=FhK92J4hX6S4/ycuxIyEUYI7yh2VFafdZKmOe3ODYCg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=tw1EO5FU4BIVZeXaH+sXLbeT8VfK8yYn6ciPBd6INI9OofcGgdJFuhAq3FH6M5xKUlpz6FupXyFfzGxUNq6WWgawjnty+hydzrgGnwJAiYoQw+rnGUp9NmKD7BXTvRDtfFTEM1EWo/a0t3EzsHCurqLbXUyrgHDl4AfrjAPSiCs= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=mTPyVtK9gfQmGDXrg/XjveFGjkdkeCqUHki1zzrweegad4tOL029gS7KhrfZpmfKNs76klUhQNs7cEljBC7NCsXIc1CiBOKVHd3beqnJDnQSMj9ezzjXm8IZTbZNvRRYwmAx/EkizFCUvTi2R10uGVMVj4f6GhI6BJNc7v8nuLA= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23QuDOD4+inZQNoqpThk0De7YwDgG4=FAbv5EgQmJ5QQQg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <372EEAF266214ECDB1E430B737F510BA@GaryPC><BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102CB0B68CCD78@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <CAA8k23QuDOD4+inZQNoqpThk0De7YwDgG4=FAbv5EgQmJ5QQQg@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Gary, Andy, LF Group, Isn't -41dB about right for OP32? 8.192 seconds per symbol, = 0.122Hz, = 43dB down on 2500Hz. It would also be consistent with the reports showing Op4 decoding consistently at -32dB SNR or a few dB less. Going to Op32 should reduce the bandwidth by a factor of 8, so 9dB below the level of Op4 should be OK. Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: WSPR V OPERA, qrss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR V OPERA, qrss |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Opera weak signal Rx, Gary G4WGT |
Next by Thread: | LF: New to group, [email protected] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |