Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+ON7WP\s+now\s+testing\s+on\s+503\,000\s+kHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+ON7WP\s+now\s+testing\s+on\s+503\,000\s+kHz\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: Richard Newstead <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:30:56 +0100; Seeing some weak traces on 503 kHz, it may be ON7WP ?? G I too can see a signal on 503kHz - not audible yet but clearly visible on the FFT. 73 Richard IO83wg; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00013.html (10,055 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: Richard Newstead <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:34:45 +0100; Seeing some weak traces on 503 kHz, it may be ON7WP ?? 2030z the cw is now audible and readable by ear here. Weak at present. 73 Richard G3CWI; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00041.html (10,026 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: Richard Newstead <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:54:05 +0100; ON7WP QRS signal last night at 2135utc. At 2130 ON7WP was 549. OR7T was 419. GW3UEP also 419. Gus (SM? I forget his call) was 569. I called many times but my TX will only QSY to 502.5 so could not ne; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00053.html (10,476 bytes)
4. LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:07:41 +0100; Pedro, LF, Seeing some weak traces on 503 kHz, it may be ON7WP ?? Gary - G4WGT - IO83QP --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00104.html (10,481 bytes)
5. LF: Re: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:32:35 +0100; Dear Pedro, LF Group, Was not at home last night, but will be around tonight and tomorrow night - I now have my normal 500kHz antenna back in place, so should be a reasonable signal. Cheers, Jim Mori; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00150.html (10,698 bytes)
6. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:29:37 +0100; I guess distance makes a big difference on 500kHz. I was not in a position to call Pedro last night, but at 2030z ON7WP was 559 here in Bracknell IO91PJ. At 2100z he was peaking 579 on the meter. Sol; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00161.html (10,528 bytes)
7. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: Richard Newstead <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:41:57 +0100; 2030z the cw is now audible and readable by ear here. Weak at present. When you key I can see sidebands +/- 8Hz on your signal. 00; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00185.html (10,121 bytes)
8. Re: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:22:13 +0200; Hello Richard, I copied you 429 on 502.0 and a bit later on 502.5 But as Perdo, ON7WP, (here 599+40dB) was on I didn't call. Let's try a QSO one of the next days (when QRN is low it should work). GW3; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00194.html (11,285 bytes)
9. RE: LF: RE: ON7WP now testing on 503,000 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:45:31 +0100; Pedro. LF, ON7WP QRS signal last night at 2135utc. 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo I guess distance makes a big difference on 500kHz. I was not in a position to call Pedro last night, but at 2030z ON7WP was; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00265.html (11,510 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]