Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+NRRL\s+proposal\s+for\s+a\s+630m\s+Band\s+Plan\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+NRRL\s+proposal\s+for\s+a\s+630m\s+Band\s+Plan\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:18:04 +0000; Hi Tony, is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna? I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ______________; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00148.html (11,496 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:27:10 +0100; Hi Rik Yes it is. But it is not the only strange proposal for this meeting. The DARC would like to establish HF-Links for VHF/UHF Repeaters! 73 de Toni Am 08.02.2013 10:18, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hi To; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00181.html (11,682 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:44:38 +0000 (GMT); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00321.html (14,401 bytes)
4. LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:12:42 +0000; Hello Chris, the "where to monitor" problem can be solved by agreeing on some centre of activity frequencies for CW, QRSS etc. This is far less rigid than a band plan. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00358.html (15,740 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]