Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Loop\s+vs\s+Marconi\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Loop\s+vs\s+Marconi\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: Loop vs Marconi (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:08:08 +0000; Dear Bill, LF Group At 23:50 13/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: . My data and mathematical studies indicate that a simple 50'x50' loop with a .37" conductor is ~6db inferior to a 50' tall vertical, having; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00187.html (11,477 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Loop vs Marconi (score: 1): Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:50:37 -0500; Peter, When we started on 73kHz some years ago G2AJV was the first to put out a reasonably strong signal and he was using a large loop. G4JNT and G3XDV also put out reasonable signals from very restr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00202.html (11,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]