Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Interesting\s+False\s+WSPR\s+Decode\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Interesting\s+False\s+WSPR\s+Decode\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Interesting False WSPR Decode (score: 1): Author: "g3zjo" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:59:27 +0100; Jim has been playing doubles today with real signals too. 2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503820 -17 -2 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47 2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503989 -33 -2 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00062.html (19,850 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Interesting False WSPR Decode (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:56:04 +0100; Dear Andy, Eddie, LF Group, Actually these "double false decodes" are not particularly rare, although not usually correctly formatted as a beacon signal, so they don't make it into the database. For; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00213.html (12,630 bytes)
3. LF: RE: Interesting False WSPR Decode (score: 1): Author: "Mike.WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:19:12 -0500; That is a software bug. I have seen it once in a while on my HF band decodes. Mike WE0H 2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503820 -17 -2 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47 2010-03-25 17:36 G3ZJO 0.503989 -33; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00534.html (9,722 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]