Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 13:12:19 +0100; Thanks' for the data Jim I think you may have the reason for the miss printing of the 500/1 mode on 500 , selective fading, from previous 'trials it showed to be very close in , even 50 Hz shift show; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00095.html (21,681 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 01:51:56 +0100; Dear Graham, LF Group, Well, not much to choose between the two here... see the output logs for both modes at the 2.5W level below. Some selective fading was evident, as you can see in the attachment; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00196.html (22,408 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 23:26:08 +0100; Tnx Rik Just added WSPR as well ... G .. From: [email protected] Rik Strobbe Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:08 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject: LF: R; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00378.html (21,393 bytes)
4. LF: RE: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 00:08:23 +0200; Graham, your first 2.5W transmission: 500Hz: RX1: <22:01 UTC> <9,8 Hz> BN0NBDBJF6]AIA.@_M>,19[G.64190:MH-@F+ <CANCEL> <-32 dB> EME : RX1: <22:01 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) 2.5 <C; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00430.html (20,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]