Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+DFCW\,\s+power\s+and\s+time\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+DFCW\,\s+power\s+and\s+time\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: DFCW, power and time. (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:28:52 +0100; Dear J, LF Group, Checking the meter would definitely be a good idea - If you are putting out a decent signal, there must be some current there somewhere! As you say there should be about 1.4A at the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-07/msg00024.html (9,934 bytes)
2. LF: RE: DFCW, power and time. (score: 1): Author: "james moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:25:04 +0100; Dear J, LF Group, Going from 100W to 410W will produce just over double the antenna current, so unless "almost no antenna base current" is about 1.4A, the power increase will not in itself achieve yo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-07/msg00025.html (9,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]