Hello all, Maybe we have to differnciate what people do understand as "band plan": A typical band plan leads some OMs to complain about others like "Hey you have done QRSS on 47x.x kHz but this is t
Unfortunately Modern data modes are / can be frequency agile and tend to jump about within defined boundaries , so the rx end has to know where to set the rx dial to intercept them Many of the transm
Dial frequency means nothing for those of us in CW rx mode. I prefer the actual RF frequency to be specified and those interested can work out the Dial frequency for SSB mode. g3kev -- Original Messa
Can you advise why you are seeking to impose a "plan" on the rest of the world when it patently is not required, nor is it desired by many. History suggests that flexibility is required, and the quan
Dear Klaus, in my opinion it is far too early for a rigid band plan. At this moment only few countries are active on 472-479kHz, in 2013 things will change. Let's wait until then to decide a. if we r
Can you advise why you are seeking to impose a "plan" on the rest of the world when it patently is not required, nor is it desired by many. History suggests that flexibility is required, and the quan
Dear Klaus, in my opinion it is far too early for a rigid band plan. At this moment only few countries are active on 472-479kHz, in 2013 things will change. Let's wait until then to decide a. if we
I dont think NDB's are dying quite yet - I installed/commisisoned 7 new ones the year before last :-), but some parts of the world they are dissapearing slowly save the private ones. Its a bit like s
In einer eMail vom 05.10.2012 22:46:18 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]: I dont think NDB's are dying quite yet - I installed/commisisoned 7 new ones the year before
Dear All, do you remember? We wrote: as a first proposal for discussion we present a "plan. The key words were: first, proposal and plan (in quotation marks!). We continued to emphasize again: it is
