Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+R6BWO\s+\&\s+DL1EIE\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+R6BWO\s+\&\s+DL1EIE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: R6BWO & DL1EIE (score: 1): Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:36:04 +0100; Jim & Fabian I stand corrected. Having consulted my meticulously kept log last night, of course Uli is DJ9IE not DL9IE! 73, Tom G3OLB actually the call DL1EIE is absolutely correct. He is located nea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00296.html (8,398 bytes)
2. Re: LF: R6BWO & DL1EIE (score: 1): Author: "Fabian Kurz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:39:35 +0100; Hello, actually the call DL1EIE is absolutely correct. He is located near to my QTH and has a good signal here. However, R6BWO is certianly F6BWO... 73 & only believe what you hear with your own ears; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00297.html (8,917 bytes)
3. Re: LF: R6BWO & DL1EIE (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:47:10 +0100; Dear Tom, LF Group, Now youv'e got me worried - at my QTH DL9IE appears as DJ9IE - a couple more dots getting stretched out in the peculiar perturbations of the ether around Hatfield? What with this,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00299.html (8,808 bytes)
4. LF: R6BWO & DL1EIE (score: 1): Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:00:44 +0100; Ref. new stations R6BWO and DL1EIE on 136: My theory is that the missing dot in Jeff F6BWO's call sign got mysteriously delayed and re-appeared in that of DL9IE! Both stations have been very active o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00302.html (8,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]