Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+QRS\s+V\s+Opera\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+QRS\s+V\s+Opera\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: QRS V Opera (score: 1): Author: "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:53:44 +0100 (CET); This question would better be answered by the author but by myself. But first the decode section of the program might help OPERA to reception of weaker signals. In the case that you can hear the carr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00561.html (10,310 bytes)
2. LF: QRS V Opera (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:12:12 +0100; MF/LF What advantage has Opera over QRSS. So far all Opera signals I have observed would be perfect copy in QRSS mode and in most cases are also Audible and suitable for CW also CW es QRSS are a more; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00955.html (8,200 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]