Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Opera\s+decode\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Opera\s+decode\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: John Gibbs <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:28:28 -0800; Decode from LA4ANA just after local sunset here.. was this station even on air at 18_0141 utc ??? Must be bogus. Anyone know why version of Opera v1.5.8 on LF or MF would not show on PSK map. Earlier; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00289.html (9,514 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: Alex R7NT <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:18:23 +0300; John, I had such a following spot on my PC in v1.5.8 05:45 136 R7NT de WE2XPQ Op32 Deep Search ?? 7881 km -42 dB in Palmer Alaska 1542.8 Hz ** 17/01/2016 ** SR in UA6 is 05:08 Opera's was OFF at; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00294.html (12,076 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:39:28 -0500; Hi John, Alex, according to my opds spot 2016-01-17 05:33:06 R7NT 2060km 137540.953Hz 4mHz -40.5dBOp 100% 19.8dB, the R7NT transmission ended at 5:33 (or would have if it had it been fully completed); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00300.html (13,406 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:30:21 -0900; Hi John, Alex, according to my opds spot 2016-01-17 05:33:06 R7NT 2060km 137540.953Hz 4mHz -40.5dBOp 100% 19.8dB, the R7NT transmission ended at 5:33 (or would have if it had it been fully completed); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00301.html (13,812 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:41:55 +0100; John, ''Decode from LA4ANA'' - That is the output from the dynamic DETECTOR , ie pattern matching correlation detector, provided as a second lower s/n detection system, should the Opera DECODER fail; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00302.html (10,925 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:46:34 -0900; We did the same sort of thing a few days back to validate ja5np decode of xpq - time and exact frequency were good... L; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00303.html (11,635 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 23:16:50 +0100; L, Yes, that's the problem, if the Tx site is 'remote' , well not a problem if you fire the opera decoder -40 and above , then you have a data decode, call sign, s/n, % fade and frequency , but if th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00305.html (12,794 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: John Gibbs <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:29:58 -0800; Thanks all for the further explanation of my mysterious opera dynamic detection decode. Another opera detection has shown up this evening, and posting here for info only. 05:24 136 G3XDV de VE7BDQ Op; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00307.html (9,804 bytes)
9. Re: LF: Opera decode (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:08:56 +0100; Deep Search ?? ?? in this case = Random noise Nothing mysterious , Dynamic simply engages , should the main decoder fail, the look-up table of call signs is also maintained via the web .. s/n levels; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00318.html (10,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]