Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LF\s+reflector\,\s+since\?\s+73k\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LF\s+reflector\,\s+since\?\s+73k\s+\?\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:21:25 +0100; Hi Warren, yes but its nice to see enthusiasm still on the LF bands even if ol'farts like me keep on squelching them with "been there done that" :-)) Alan G3NYK -- Original Message -- From: "Warren Z; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00115.html (16,985 bytes)
2. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:36:10 +0100; Hi Stefan, despite Roger's plea it is a known fact that there are a limited number of people interested in "doing it the hard way"....its a bit like QRP...... I think allocation is more political now; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00214.html (15,629 bytes)
3. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:47:11 +0200; Hi Alan, Am 18.10.2011 22:36, schrieb Alan Melia: Sadly 136 was decimated when 500k opened up and possibly because 500k was easier (10 times easier) .......73kHz is 4 times harder than 136k. Ah, so 9; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00283.html (13,669 bytes)
4. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:18:13 -0400; Hi Alan, I have contemplated getting a US experimental license for 73kHz but have decided (for the moment at least) against it. I believe that I could get a license, in fact I think I could get one l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00351.html (16,152 bytes)
5. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:55:26 -0400; Hi Alan, Well I will respond by making the following offer, I will help anyone who is serious about getting on 73kHz either with the license process or by loaning them transmitting equipment. -- 73 W; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00711.html (17,750 bytes)
6. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? 73k ?? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:56:10 +0100; Well did 'we' ever improve the radiated signal , or did the 'technologists' simply provide the ability to disperse the fog of noise? As Mal often points out, and may be he has a point , how many live; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00776.html (17,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]