Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-10\s+on\s+137\.42\s+kHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-10\s+on\s+137\.42\s+kHz\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:14:16 +0100; 1650 10 14 0.0 1418.78 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no Den 22.11.2012 17:40, skrev Stefan Schäfer:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00764.html (10,858 bytes)
22. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:21:50 +0100; I will be monitoring. S LA5VNA Den 22.11.2012 15:15, skrev Stefan Schäfer: LF!!! I'm running some JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz. So far we concentrated to JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00801.html (10,612 bytes)
23. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:40:03 +0100; OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have a chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if someone is receiving at all... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 22.11.2012 15:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00854.html (11,039 bytes)
24. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:45:39 +0100; Hi Stefan, got the first decode 10 minutes after starting the WSJT-X monitor: 2010 10 14 -2.2 1919.89 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK but for some reason nil from your latest over at 20:30. Your signal strength no; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00858.html (13,596 bytes)
25. RE: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Halldór <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:43:55 +0100; Ok, one from Stefan 2130 10 -21 0.4 1021.48 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Halldór From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Halldór Sent: 22. nóvemb; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00901.html (21,406 bytes)
26. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:16:29 +0100; LF, I've just added another 3 dB to my signal. Is there (still) some interest in the JT9-10 beacon? Otherwise i would stop it and do some tests /improvements /maintenance on the MF loading coil. 73,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00931.html (11,556 bytes)
27. LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:15:36 +0100; LF!!! I'm running some JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz. So far we concentrated to JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very suitable for serious data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00959.html (9,717 bytes)
28. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:50:56 +0100; Thanks very much for the spot Haldór, glad my little 0.5W ERP are making it your way! My clock should be spot on now, and I'm reading Stefan's last one: 2130 10 12 -1.3 1919.89 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK ...; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00960.html (21,789 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]