Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz

[Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

LF,

I've just added another 3 dB to my signal.
Is there (still) some interest in the JT9-10 beacon? Otherwise i would 
stop it and do some tests /improvements /maintenance on the MF loading coil.
73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 22.11.2012 18:14, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
> 1650  10   14   0.0 1418.78  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK
>
> LA5VNA Steinar
> loc:JO59jq
> Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG
> www.opera.no
>
> Den 22.11.2012 17:40, skrev Stefan Schäfer:
>    
> > OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have a
> > chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if someone
> > is receiving at all...
> >
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> > Am 22.11.2012 15:15, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
> >      
> > > LF!!!
> > >
> > > I'm running some *JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz*. So far we concentrated to
> > > JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very
> > > suitable for serious data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some bugs.
> > >
> > > I'm running only 5W TX power, later, when the band opens for DX i may
> > > rise the levels by some dB. I do not expect timing of frequency drift
> > > problems from my side.
> > >
> > > Reports apprechiated :-)
> > >
> > > If there is some interest on the TA side, i may run this over the
> > > night as well.
> > >
> > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> > >        
> >      
>
>