Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-10\s+on\s+137\.42\s+kHz\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: George Szymanski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:17:43 +0000
Nothing here so far Stefan! I am monitoring with SL so you can check my grabber, as well as WSJT. Conditions have not been good for the past week or two however. 73 de George, DU1GM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00005.html (12,024 bytes)

2. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Michel Brunel <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:38:34 +0100
Hi Stefan, 1550 10 20 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1610 10 19 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 20 db SNR not bad ! Michel - f5wk Le jeudi 22 novembre 2012 à 15:15:36, Stefan écrivait : LF!!! I'm runnin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00044.html (11,081 bytes)

3. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:55:11 +0100
Well done Andrey, thanks a lot! 73, Markus From: [email protected] rn3agc Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:49 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00060.html (13,137 bytes)

4. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:50:43 +0100
Yeah! :-) Thanks Spiros and Halld&oacute;r :-) OK so it looks reasonably :-) I'll let it run some time longer. 73, Stefan Am 22.11.2012 22:42, schrieb SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios: Report for DK7FC. 2130
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00085.html (12,839 bytes)

5. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 01:49:33 +0400
Hi Stefan, Markus, Albert, LF 2010 10 -23 -0.4 1420.27 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 2030 10 -21 -0.4 1420.27 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 2050 10 -27 2.2 1420.26 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 2100 10 -31 -1.7 1425.39 0.00 DK7FC DF6NM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00102.html (11,911 bytes)

6. LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:43:55 +0100
Report for DK7FC. 2130 10 -29 -0.9 1020.11 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Dial 136.4 center qrg 1020. 73, Spiros/SV8CS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00112.html (12,065 bytes)

7. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: George Szymanski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:29:38 +0000
Me too! 73 de George, DU1GM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00118.html (10,471 bytes)

8. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:18:25 +0100
Am 22.11.2012 18:12, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: thanks Stefan for raising the power: 1650 10 -27 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Tnx! Yes, too bad that Joe do not implement simply a slow WSPR sharing the da
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00138.html (11,580 bytes)

9. LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:11:07 +0100
GE to All. I am monitoring 136 (dial USB)- JT9-10. 73, Spiros/SV8CS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00230.html (11,678 bytes)

10. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:03:20 +0100
Thanks Markus, What do you think about the -2.2 time delay? I don't know where it may come from. The program is driving the transmit converter directly, you know. I was running a very old version of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00270.html (14,829 bytes)

11. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:07:39 +0100
Oh, i just remember and see that JT9-10 is intended to run on 1000...1100 Hz audio frequencies. However the bandplan says that digimodes are at 137.4...137.6 kHz. So one has to change to 5 FFT bins/p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00295.html (12,272 bytes)

12. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: André Guyé <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:03:50 +0100
Always good signal Stefan JT9-10 on 137.42. Also 559 clear by ears. Sorry, I have 0.02 hertz error on your frequency. 1430 10 14 0.0 1419.98 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1440 1 -3 -1.7 1424.14 0.00 1450 10 13 0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00340.html (13,029 bytes)

13. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: IK1WVQ Mauro <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:57:42 +0100
hi, this is the complete list of DK7FC spots this evening: 1650 10 -27 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1850 3 -28 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1910 7 -28 2.2 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1930 10 -25 2.2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00345.html (11,766 bytes)

14. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: IK1WVQ Mauro <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:12:27 +0100
thanks Stefan for raising the power: 1650 10 -27 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Yes, too bad that Joe do not implement simply a slow WSPR sharing the database .... should be very useful to know also W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00371.html (10,510 bytes)

15. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:51:36 +0100
Hi Mauro I think Stefan is using center frequency ;) la5vna S Den 22.11.2012 15:45, skrev IK1WVQ Mauro: HI , 137.42 is the DIAL frequency ?? what offset ??? 73 de Ik1WVQ At 15.15 22/11/12, you wrote:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00460.html (12,073 bytes)

16. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:17:39 +0100
... sorry Stefan, I think there was a clock error on my side, which might also have caused the missing decodes. Have restarted the NTP software again. I'm using wsjtx v0.4 r2746 here which runs nice
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00542.html (15,914 bytes)

17. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:16:30 +0100
André, Incredible! 559 with 5W????? There must be a special propagation path between us :-) Thanks for the reports. The 20 mHz offset may be from my side because the frequency is not generated in Spe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00571.html (14,173 bytes)

18. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: IK1WVQ Mauro <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:45:01 +0100
HI , 137.42 is the DIAL frequency ?? what offset ??? 73 de Ik1WVQ At 15.15 22/11/12, you wrote: LF!!! I'm running some JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz. So far we concentrated to JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by J
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00594.html (10,347 bytes)

19. Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:00:27 +0100
It's 136+1420 73, Stefan Am 22.11.2012 15:45, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: HI , 137.42 is the DIAL frequency ?? what offset ??? 73 de Ik1WVQ At 15.15 22/11/12, you wrote: LF!!! I'm running some JT9-10 on 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00653.html (11,770 bytes)

20. RE: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Halldór <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:37:31 +0100
Just got this decode. 2120   4  -37   0.9 1026.60  0.00   DK7FC DF6NM K But no decode so far from Stefan. Halldór From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00761.html (19,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu