Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-1\s+and\s+2\,\s+echoes\,\s+waterfall\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:41:08 +0100
Hi Eddie, LF, I'm transmitting JT9-30 since 15 UTC, see http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html Like yesterday i'm running my receiver down in the office on the Win7 PC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00150.html (11,076 bytes)

2. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:23:06 +0000
Hi Stefan 02r2702 seems to have cured the nasty rattle at COM Port release here. Non de-code checks done here today on JT9-2, it looks to me that your TX / RX need to be stable over the 2min period t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00372.html (12,335 bytes)

3. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: John Langridge <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Eddie, LF, Am 30.10.2012 11:25, schrieb g3zjo: Hi Stefan I found the lack / loss of decodes annoying, one cause was slight frequency drift in my transverter, WSPR is not effected but JT9-2 is. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00384.html (13,007 bytes)

4. LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:30:29 +0100
The ghost echo appeared again today on every JT9-1 transmission from Stefan. The effect appears in the waterfall and seems to create sync points, so may possibly affect decoding. But there is no trac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00432.html (14,599 bytes)

5. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:15:48 -0400
On 10/30/2012 2:41 PM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Like yesterday i'm running my receiver down in the office on the Win7 PC. However there are no decodes so far after 4 rounds. In the next round i want to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00480.html (11,235 bytes)

6. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:25:43 +0000
Hi Stefan I found the lack / loss of decodes annoying, one cause was slight frequency drift in my transverter, WSPR is not effected but JT9-2 is. I feel there were other periods of unexplained non de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00575.html (17,143 bytes)

7. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:47:10 +0100
Hello Markus, OK so far. Thanks for your observations. Why are the levels so low? This is another open question. And why are decodes missed? Have you watched the decoder, was it finished before the n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00657.html (15,064 bytes)

8. Re: LF: JT9-1 and 2, echoes, waterfall (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:30:31 +0100
Hi Eddie, LF, Am 30.10.2012 11:25, schrieb g3zjo: Hi Stefan I found the lack / loss of decodes annoying, one cause was slight frequency drift in my transverter, WSPR is not effected but JT9-2 is. I f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00761.html (11,236 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu