Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+How\s+bad\s+my\s+receiver\s+was\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+How\s+bad\s+my\s+receiver\s+was\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: How bad my receiver was.... (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:22:03 -0500; Greetings All: After the excitement on Friday night I took a hard look at finding out how bad my receiving system really was. With the effort of some friends yesterday and this morning I am now able; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00147.html (8,840 bytes)
2. LF: How bad my receiver was.... (score: 1): Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:00:56 -0500; Hello Lowfers, just read that Larry, VA3LK works on further improving his receiving station after having been able to hear DCF39 33 dB above the noise last weekend. If we find a reliable way to find; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00151.html (8,960 bytes)
3. Re: LF: How bad my receiver was.... (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:02:09 +0200; About short or long period signal level recordings Any stable, preferably calibrated, selective rf level meter should be useful for short period signal strength variation checks. Or even for long tim; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00157.html (11,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]