Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Fw\:\s+\[rsgb_lf_group\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Opera\s+QRG\s+for\s+472\s+Khz\s+Band\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Fw\:\s+\[rsgb_lf_group\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Opera\s+QRG\s+for\s+472\s+Khz\s+Band\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Fw: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ? (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:10:45 +0100; I think some careful thought should go into the bandplanning to avoid a conflict of modes especially those that want to QSO as opposed to those unattended Beacon qrm generators in any mode. ie REPEAT; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00365.html (17,066 bytes)
2. LF: Fw: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ? (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:15:20 +0100; Dave Activity has already started on the new 472 band and this could set the trend by the time we get there. I have observed some CW , QRSS and Beacon acty already. Any frequency that takes your fanc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00420.html (16,746 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Fw: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: New Opera QRG for 472 Khz Band ? (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:21:08 +0000; I think we should proceed with caution we are fortunate in having the full allocation others may not be so lucky also some of the dormant NDBs may be activated rendering parts of the band unusable fo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00670.html (19,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]