Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Frequency\s+standards\s+for\s+LF\.\s+The\s+next\s+g\s+eneration\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:57:42 +0100
Yes, possibly. But reception of MSF here is marred by local interference which kills the ability to keep to much better than 10^-9 even with a very narrow PLL. Trying to use the 1PPS output, which re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00043.html (19,295 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:44:18 -0500
Andy: First, my thanks for not choosing a signal reference that is Eurocentric, DCF77, MSF etc. That is appreciated very much. Clarification. What you have done is taken a crystal 4.1.... MHz, that i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00044.html (10,135 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:02:09 +0000
Andy Maybe I am missing something here, (and I am certainly not trying to detract from an excellent piece of work) but couldn't you also take the one second markers from MSF using an AM receiver, and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00047.html (15,364 bytes)

4. LF: Frequency standards for LF. The next g eneration (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:24:48 +0100
Looking at frequency standards for LF, the requirements are slightly different than for the higher frequencies. For microwaves, where instantaneous frequency (over a few seconds) needs to be very goo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00048.html (14,969 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu