Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+FW\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+FW\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 09:17:15 +0200; Graham, this is what I copied last night, but due to some oddity of the refelcter the message did not come through: Van: Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zondag 2 mei 2010 23:56 Aan: [email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00408.html (24,838 bytes)
2. Re: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:02:02 +0100; Thanks Rik Well that was not supposed to happen .. hihi .. Jose had expected the 500/1 to give the best copy ..... 73 - G .. From: [email protected] Rik Strobbe Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00444.html (25,068 bytes)
3. RE: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 16:17:11 +0200; Graham, I guess that in theory the 500Hz version should be better (FM with a better modulation index ?) But only if noise is uniform. What about a simultanious session ROS-EME / JT4C ? Both have abou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00567.html (27,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]