Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ERP\s+calculations\s+\/\s+measurements\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ERP\s+calculations\s+\/\s+measurements\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: ERP calculations / measurements (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:36:49 +0100; Hello group, it seems to be generally accepted that a small vertical antenna has a gain of 3 (4.77dBi / 2.62dBd), due to the radiation pattern in the vertical plane. But in very few cases this gain s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00428.html (11,096 bytes)
2. Re: LF: ERP calculations / measurements (score: 1): Author: Brian Rogerson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:19:49 +0000; Rik and LF Your email below prompted me to carry out another afternoon of measurements from higher ground for the station FS/ERP survey. The results seem spectacular though I am unsure of what they m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00120.html (11,178 bytes)
3. Re: LF: ERP calculations / measurements (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:04:43 +0000; A perfect lossless gound and a lossless (superconducting :-) radiator. Real reductions in gain which appear as increase in antenna resistance come about when the lossy ground terminates the local E f; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00672.html (12,632 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]