Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ERP\s+\-\s+EIRP\s+\-\s+PAR\.\.\.\s+Some\s+comments\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ERP\s+\-\s+EIRP\s+\-\s+PAR\.\.\.\s+Some\s+comments\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: ERP - EIRP - PAR... Some comments. (score: 1): Author: "F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:15:05 +0100; Hi all. I agree 100% with RIK. Yes, and in France the EIRP limit is 1 Watt only, because the minimum distance from the south coast in France to Algeria is below 800 km (621 km exactly). This 1 Watt E; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00191.html (16,430 bytes)
2. Re: LF: ERP - EIRP - PAR... Some comments. (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:32:04 +0100; Andy, I wonder if you have slightly misinterpreted the outcome of WRC-12. I think the passage that Rik quoted shows that we can still have the full 5 W if we are more than 379 km north of the French; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00223.html (16,963 bytes)
3. RE: LF: ERP - EIRP - PAR... Some comments. (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:08:50 +0000; John, Andy, indeed: "Administrations may increase this limit of e.i.r.p. to 5 W in portions of their territory which are at a distance of over 800 km from the borders of .. " It is up to the national; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-01/msg00227.html (17,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]