Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Dual\s+mode\s+data\s+test\s+QPSK31$503\.2$\s+\+\s+PSKAM10\s+$503\.1$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Dual\s+mode\s+data\s+test\s+QPSK31$503\.2$\s+\+\s+PSKAM10\s+$503\.1$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Dual mode data test QPSK31(503.2) + PSKAM10 (503.1) (score: 1): Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:16:15 +0100; Graham, According to the 'printed word' the PSKAM10 mode is supposed to be quite robust .. The printed word is correct, at least to a point. PSKAM10 (only available in F6CTE's MultiPSK program)is def; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00293.html (13,378 bytes)
2. LF: Dual mode data test QPSK31(503.2) + PSKAM10 (503.1) (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:04:18 +0100; Thanks for reports on last two test's, looks like psk could be used as a qso mode on the band , even with existing power levels , for these tests im estimating a peak erp in the region of 50 mW maxim; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00294.html (12,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]