To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Dual mode data test QPSK31(503.2) + PSKAM10 (503.1) |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:04:18 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <009801c7f015$16b3cc90$0d00000a@AGB> <001e01c7f189$0d8bd570$0e00000a@AGB> <003f01c7f19a$37f1f590$0e00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <008c01c7f19f$58c1abd0$0e00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <000c01c7f1a2$1e015bf0$0e00000a@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks for reports on last two test's, looks like psk could be used as a qso
mode on the band , even with existing power levels , for these tests im
estimating a peak erp in the region of 50 mW maximum
According to the 'printed word' the PSKAM10 mode is supposed to be quite robust .. As a simple 'head to head' I'll run the two modes in parallel. sunset till midnight as before , each stream will be -3db on stn peak output From a short test last night , noticed what appeared to be 'selective fading' something I'd not expected ? Carrier frequency (from software) 503.2 = QPSK31 USB.....Digipan 503.1= PSKAM10 ....Multipsk ver 4.4 USB TnxGraham .. |
Previous by Date: | LF: TS850 transmit on LF, k2ors |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: beacon psk31, Peter March |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: PSK31 , DATA STREAM 503.2 === MODE CHANGE TO QPSK31, Graham |
Next by Thread: | LF: beacon psk31, Peter March |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |