Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Dial\s+frequency\s+\-\s+or\s+better\s+not\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Dial\s+frequency\s+\-\s+or\s+better\s+not\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Dial frequency - or better not? (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 23:46:30 +0200; Graham, yes I know... but let me suggest two points you might consider adopting in future Op versions: With WSPR v2, there is a "BFO" setting allowing to configure the RX audio frequency range. The T; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00063.html (17,544 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Dial frequency - or better not? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:27:46 +0100; Yes the Op system is included in the new vhf beacons . so a direct frequency error indication would be advantageous .. this is something that needs to be looked at , I know from the trial versions ,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00720.html (20,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]