Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DL6NN\s+on\s+137\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DL6NN\s+on\s+137\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:54:41 +0200; LF, A new (?) station, DL6NN is QRV on 137 NOW. I am in QSO with him and it will take some time it seems ;-) DL6NN is not visible on the DF6NM grabber. So is it a weak local station? Can someone see; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00008.html (9,050 bytes)
2. RE: LF: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:51:44 +0200; Minto, I was active on 136kHz with a similar antenna (15m high, 25m long "lazy-L" antenna) and in addition the losses were very high (abt. 130-160 Ohm). Despite that I managed to work distances up to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00016.html (14,370 bytes)
3. Re: LF: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:26:35 +0200; Hi Mal, 1 KW should be enough for a regular CW QSO I suppose. But on the other hand: my antenna efficiency is very low. I did some calculations with MMANA-GAL and the radiation resistance of my 30 mt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00088.html (14,387 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]