Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Cross\-band\s+etiquette\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Cross\-band\s+etiquette\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Cross-band etiquette (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:41:39 +0100; Interesting comments John. You must certainly bear in mind that working crossband 80m to 500kHz is currently a very minor interest and something that the vast majority of users of 80m will be totally; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00450.html (9,878 bytes)
2. LF: Cross-band etiquette (score: 1): Author: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:58:00 +0000; Hello LF, It is normal, polite amateur practice to a) listen for a few minutes and b) send a signal such as QRL? when selecting an operating frequency. On 500kHz itself this is rarely a problem, as b; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00601.html (11,625 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Cross-band etiquette (score: 1): Author: John GM4SLV <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:10:00 +0000; Hello Dave, LF, Yes, I totally agree that for the majority of 80m users the existence of 500kHz cross-band activity is either unknown of of no interest. I'm not surprised or concerned, that normal 80; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00608.html (11,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]