Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Comparison\s+of\s+QRSS\s+speed\s+performance\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Comparison\s+of\s+QRSS\s+speed\s+performance\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance. (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:48:21 +0100; Hello Dave and Alan, Really impressing how little power is needed to travel 220km at 136kHz. The 360mW needed for the CW copy should be no more than about 1mW ERP I guess, QRSS60 does the job with no; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00064.html (9,019 bytes)
2. LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance. (score: 1): Author: "Dave Pick" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:34:41 +0100; Dear all. I did some tests today with Alan G3NYK at about 220km distance, to compare the performance of different QRSS speeds under real band conditions. How much better is QRSS60 than QRSS10 or QRSS; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00113.html (8,203 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]