Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Burred\s+conterpoise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Burred\s+conterpoise\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Burred conterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 00:05:32 +0000 (GMT); Hi, Group. It seems to me extremely worth then formulas show the conderpoise wich lie on soil surface is the extremely bad case. To reduce losses conterpoise should be elevated or burred to adequate; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00046.html (8,680 bytes)
2. LF: Burred conterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:06:09 +0000 (GMT); Hi, Group! I have just derived formula for ground loss when conterpoise is burred. Configuration is the same then conterpoise is elevated. But now h is conterpoise depth. Also wire radius r appears i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00061.html (9,393 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]