Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Burred conterpoise |
| From: | "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 25 May 2002 00:05:32 +0000 (GMT) |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Group. On Wed, 22 May 2002, Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: It seems to me extremely worth then formulas show the conderpoise wich lie on soil surface is the extremely bad case. To reduce losses conterpoise should be elevated or burred to adequate depth. To elevate isbetter... And not better, but much better. There is a figure in attach to show this. 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [Lowfer] RE: litz wire, hamilton mal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: alpha signals, SOMMEREYNS RUDDY |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Burred conterpoise, Alexander S. Yurkov |
| Next by Thread: | LF: bandwidth, hamilton mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
