Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Bugfix\s+for\s+ebnaut

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Bugfix\s+for\s+ebnaut_ifft\s+utility\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Bugfix for ebnaut_ifft utility (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:59:04 -0400; Dear EbNauteers, I recently stumbled upon a bug in my ebnaut_ifft3a utility, which is used to convert SpecLab FFT export files to IQ wav files. The first step of the inverse FFT is to take the comple; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00067.html (9,607 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Bugfix for ebnaut_ifft utility (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 18:47:42 +0200; Thanks Markus, What does minor SNR degradation mean, in dB, and on what does this value depend? (e.g. transmission time, symbol length, etc). 73, Stefan Am 07.06.2017 17:59, schrieb Markus Vester: De; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00069.html (10,093 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Bugfix for ebnaut_ifft utility (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:56:31 -0400; Hi Stefan, this is not easy to say as it depends on a number of circumstances. In your local test, the difference was quite large (EbN0 = 40.25 dB vs 41.57 dB), but this is because the lack of extern; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00070.html (11,343 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]