Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Beacon\s+signals\s+tonight\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:50:04
I measured the frequency difference as 1.75Hz at 20.30UT (using Spectogram). I can not measure absolute strengths but the higher frequency was 2dB stronger here. Both signals were well above noise, w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00222.html (10,540 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:47:08 +0200
Signal report on Wednesday eve, 24 Jan 2001: MOBMU 135.92.., Fs average +4 dB(uV/m) G3AQC 135.92.., Fs average +1 dB(uV/m) Beat until 21 UTC stable 1.74 Hz, after 21 UTC about 1.6 Hz. -- Signal repor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00226.html (9,405 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:07:59 +0100
[snip] M0BMU 135.922, Fs average +2 dB(uV/m) G3ACQ 135.924, Fs average +5 dB(uV/m) [snip] Väinö, are you sure to not have them reversed ? I am at work now, and don't have the screen grabs handy, but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00265.html (9,298 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:16:01 +0200
Signal report on Tuesday evening 23 Jan 2001: M0BMU 135.922, Fs average +2 dB(uV/m) G3ACQ 135.924, Fs average +5 dB(uV/m) DL3FDO was transmitting tests abt 136.9 kHz: his Fs was around -1 dB(uV/m) --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00268.html (10,460 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:50:24 +0100
Same here in Italy, JN45SL. The two stations were received with solid white lines on a dark blue background, I would say 'OOO' :-) And this just using the 14 MHz dipole as antenna (low gain, but almo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00270.html (10,163 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Bill de Carle" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:17:11 -0500
So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of seeing either signal will easily sepe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00273.html (10,599 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "jannsen" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:01:53 +0100
James Moritz schrieb: Dear LF Group, So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00275.html (9,784 bytes)

8. LF: Beacon signals tonight (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:08:24 +0000
Dear LF Group, So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of seeing either signal w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00290.html (9,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu