I measured the frequency difference as 1.75Hz at 20.30UT (using Spectogram). I can not measure absolute strengths but the higher frequency was 2dB stronger here. Both signals were well above noise, w
Signal report on Wednesday eve, 24 Jan 2001: MOBMU 135.92.., Fs average +4 dB(uV/m) G3AQC 135.92.., Fs average +1 dB(uV/m) Beat until 21 UTC stable 1.74 Hz, after 21 UTC about 1.6 Hz. -- Signal repor
[snip] M0BMU 135.922, Fs average +2 dB(uV/m) G3ACQ 135.924, Fs average +5 dB(uV/m) [snip] Väinö, are you sure to not have them reversed ? I am at work now, and don't have the screen grabs handy, but
Signal report on Tuesday evening 23 Jan 2001: M0BMU 135.922, Fs average +2 dB(uV/m) G3ACQ 135.924, Fs average +5 dB(uV/m) DL3FDO was transmitting tests abt 136.9 kHz: his Fs was around -1 dB(uV/m) --
Same here in Italy, JN45SL. The two stations were received with solid white lines on a dark blue background, I would say 'OOO' :-) And this just using the 14 MHz dipole as antenna (low gain, but almo
So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of seeing either signal will easily sepe
James Moritz schrieb: Dear LF Group, So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of
Dear LF Group, So that G3AQC does not feel lonely, I will also run a beacon signal tonight on 135.924kHz. 1Hz seperation is quite small; but anything that stands much chance of seeing either signal w