Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+BEACON\s+\-\s+G3XIZ\s+\-\s+503\.947\s+\-\s+BAND\s+PLAN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+BEACON\s+\-\s+G3XIZ\s+\-\s+503\.947\s+\-\s+BAND\s+PLAN\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: BEACON - G3XIZ - 503.947 - BAND PLAN (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:13:23 +0100 (BST); Hi All I am being embolden by the mails I am seeing on this subject. I think Chris knows my views on this matter. I am heartened by Chris's decision to move way up the band. He no doubt remembers my; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00142.html (12,169 bytes)
2. Re: LF: BEACON - G3XIZ - 503.947 - BAND PLAN (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:23 +0100; I would support the current trend for beacons/QRSS to be towards the top end of the band. There are quite a few people crystal controlled on 502.0 and with an (apparent) increase in activity at the m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00143.html (10,041 bytes)
3. LF: BEACON - G3XIZ - 503.947 - BAND PLAN (score: 1): Author: CHRISTOPHER OSBORN <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:55:05 +0100 (BST); I've been calling CQ on CW for quite a while but had no takers so will be beaconing QRSS3 on 503.947 kHz for an hour or so. As usual all reports are welcome. I can beacon through the night if anyone; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00144.html (9,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]