Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Asia\s+Pacific\s+Band\s+Planning\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Asia\s+Pacific\s+Band\s+Planning\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Asia Pacific Band Planning... (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:20:52 +0000; Gentlemen with the usual Mal exception... Recent testing with JA has brought forward the issue of band planning on 2200m for the Asia Pacific region. After some discussion among some parties it is cl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00326.html (9,993 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Asia Pacific Band Planning... (score: 1): Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:33:55 +0200; Rick, did you receive my answer relative to your request concerning Argo ? I have received no reply from you. And the group please excuse me for the OT use of the bandwidth. I just wanted to use a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00481.html (10,328 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Asia Pacific Band Planning... (score: 1): Author: Rick Wakatori <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:14:10 +0900; Hi Scott, I am neither a representative of JARL nor a representative of 2200m band funs in Japan. I think both the RSGB' band plan and a candidate of RSGB band plan have to be concidered as a base of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00545.html (10,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]