Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Activity\s+etc\.\s+\-\s+DG3LV\s+discussion\s+\-One\s+year\s+later\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Activity etc. - DG3LV discussion -One year later (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:10:12 +0100
Hello Tobias, LF, Recently my smartphone reminded me on an entry i made last year. We discussed about the new WSQ mode and if it will be established as a permanent used QSO data mode. It was also the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00149.html (15,688 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Activity etc. - DG3LV discussion -One year later (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:23:28 +0000
Hi Stefan, Tobias, all, so far I made 130 QSO's on 472kHz: CW: 88 (68%) JT9: 35 (27%) QRS: 4 (3%) WSQ: 3 (2%) But is the average distance for CW os "only" 477km while it is 1180km for the other modes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00152.html (16,595 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Activity etc. - DG3LV discussion -One year later (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:55:48 +0100
Hi Rik, Interesting statistic. Well, when looking to the WSPR map you can see that you (and me) are quite in the center of activity. If you can work a station in CW you probably prefer that against Q
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00154.html (11,856 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Activity etc. - DG3LV discussion -One year later (score: 1)
Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:33:10 +0100
Hi Stefan ! Hi Rik, Steinar, Wolf, MF ! WSQ ... a real alternative to *CW* An Alternative ? Yes, definitely! A Replacement for CW ? Never meant to be ! The DX capabilities of WSQ are very good, down
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00158.html (19,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu