Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+A\s+help\s+with\s+rx\s+sensitivity\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+A\s+help\s+with\s+rx\s+sensitivity\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: A help with rx sensitivity ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:09:08 +0100; Mike G3XDV, mentioned using DCF39 as a standard signal for comparing aerial performance, in a previous exchange which culminated in the fascinating article and results reported by Dick PA0SE. This ha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00108.html (9,867 bytes)
2. Re: LF: A help with rx sensitivity ?? (score: 1): Author: "DF2PY" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 10:14:39 +0200; Hi Alan ! I observe DCF 39 very regularly,as it is menacing my receiving all the time. I found that there is a certain difference in its fields -vertical/horizontal power containment.When i put up my; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00110.html (9,278 bytes)
3. Re: LF: A help with rx sensitivity ?? (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:52:35; At 00:09 21/07/99 +0100, you wrote: Mike G3XDV, mentioned using DCF39 as a standard signal for comparing aerial performance, in a previous exchange which culminated in the fascinating article and res; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00124.html (9,288 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]