Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+74\.5495\s+QRSS\s+60\s+2300\s+till\s+0500\+Mike\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+74\.5495\s+QRSS\s+60\s+2300\s+till\s+0500\+Mike\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 2300 till 0500+Mike (score: 1): Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:54:08 -0400; Mike; Fabulous captures-I don't know of anyone operating higher up the band only below me as there are Loran artifacts higher up-Dex on 74.5485 and John at 74.5478 or .5475 Being weekend tomorrow I h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00286.html (12,045 bytes)
2. RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 2300 till 0500+Mike (score: 1): Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:34:37 -0500; I’ll second Mike’s motion of fascinating, including Bob’s perspective on relative SNR between captures by Hartmut, Henny and Mike. On long-term average one might expect a path loss; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00287.html (18,670 bytes)
3. RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 2300 till 0500+Mike (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:54:45 +0100; Bob, I am not sure what led you to mention frequencies above you as I mentioned only those below. It seems the traces seen on 74.5465 may not have been man made. The antenna is my 136kHz transmit inv; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00288.html (12,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]