Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+73\s+kHz\s+Wednesday\s+night\,\s+Take\s+II\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:22:43 -0500
John, Thanks for the explanation. You have always been able to explain deep technical topics in a way I can understand. Now can any Hoover be utilized for this application or do I need to purchase on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00190.html (11,589 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:57:31 -0500
Dex, I just reviewed my overnight screen captures of Laurie's frequency. Absolutely nothing received here in North Carolina. John, are you using one of those wave magnets antennas I have seen adverti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00195.html (11,360 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:51:54 -0500
I'll be amazed if someone else doesn't copy this tonight! I just reviewed my overnight screen captures of Laurie's frequency. Absolutely nothing received here in North Carolina. John, are you using o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00196.html (9,977 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 02:52:52 -0800 (PST)
This is really one for the record books! It certainly justifies the retention of 73kHz and even the professionals are probably learning something from it. The chances of making it from ZL to EU havin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00198.html (8,461 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:36:43 +0100
Congratulations to John and Laurie. Anyone who has tried 73kHz will tell you how much more difficult it is than 136kHz so this is a superb achievement. It was a product of teamwork, perseverance and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00199.html (9,991 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:26:37 -0500
Hi John, Stunning! Fabulous job! Cheers, Steve 11/21/2001 3:36:48 PM, "John Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote: Below is a screen shot of G3AQC on 72.4013 kHz taken at W1TAG on 21Nov01 from about 002
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00204.html (8,628 bytes)

7. LF: 73 kHz Wednesday night, Take II (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:36:48 -0500
Below is a screen shot of G3AQC on 72.4013 kHz taken at W1TAG on 21Nov01 from about 0025 to 0120 UTC. This is from ARGO, in 90 sec/dot mode. I tried 120 sec/dot, but there was blurring between succes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00207.html (9,862 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu