Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+27\.925\s+is\s+correct\s+dial\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:56:44 -0500
27.975 is not correct Use 27.925 for dial-Bob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00013.html (9,653 bytes)

2. RE: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 11:30:18 -0500
Graham; Temps here went from 8F to 40 yesterday and last night. No doubt had something to do with poor condx. Soil conductivity in this region of NY state is sensitive to temp. Soil conductivity drop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00225.html (60,917 bytes)

3. RE: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 11:52:14 -0500
G; I think many had gone to other bands this side. US activity was way up on MF and can't force guys to just decode one station when they can decode many more on 600 meters-Bob From: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00226.html (63,154 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:51:51 +0100
Marcus Jose has reduced the decoder pass band to 50 Hz , this reduces the over heads on the 'decision' process , it seems to be a harsh environment , compared with say 136 . there where some AFC impr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00360.html (15,730 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:36:49 +0100
Bob,all Results from the psk-map 73,G, Only decode one showing ? but there is a data set , unless the Tx power increased by 8 dB and fell back , that looks like the path is variable ? What was the Fa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00361.html (49,405 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:12:24 -0500
Graham wrote: Ok Bob Looking at the data set , AC4IU levels where very close over the 2 nights in the -40 +/- range ... Im not sure everyone was on side that night ! Early days hihi Graham, I was awa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00362.html (12,322 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 17:06:53 +0100
S/N levels , 7/8 -43 OPERA 07/03/2014 00:18 WH1XBA K3SIW-1 EN52TA RX Op2H -42 OPERA 07/03/2014 00:18 WH1XBA K3SIW-2 EN52TA RX Op2H -48 OPERA 07/03/2014 00:18 WH1XBA AC4IU FM18FG RX Op2H -40 OPERA 07/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00363.html (71,940 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:09:11 +0100
Ok Bob Looking at the data set , AC4IU levels where very close over the 2 nights in the -40 +/- range ... Im not sure everyone was on side that night ! Early days hihi 73-G, From: Bob Raide Sent: Sat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00364.html (79,273 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:38:20 +0100
Paul, I think Bob started 2200z symbol rate Opera2H: 32.768 s 239 bits = 130.5 MIns Tx cycle ? These uploaded decode times should be slightly after the end of each cycle , the opera decoder , only de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00365.html (12,580 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 17:15:40 +0000
Could someone clarify for me the times given in the opera reports, eg -44 OPERA 07/03/2014 06:51 WH1XBA W4DEX EM95TG RX Op2H Is 06:51 the end time of an opera frame, or the start time? And, is the fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00366.html (10,784 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:09:36 +0100
An Opera sequence consists of 239 raw bits (actually Manchester code half-symbols). For Op-2H, each bit is 128 * 0.256 seconds long. For some reason, reported timestamps seem to be 3.5 bits after the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00367.html (12,515 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 17:58:58 +0000
Thanks for that Graham. I'm just trying to see how far short we are of an opera decode. I just got another 0.84 dB S/N improvement by shifting the loop a little further from the prevailing noise, and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00368.html (11,190 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:36:55 +0100
Hi Graham, well opds "dBOp" has been calibrated to display SNR on the same "average power" scale as Opera, ie carrier power in 2.5 kHz minus 4 dB. However I concede that opds SNR measurements are not
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00369.html (13,714 bytes)

14. Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:06:49 +0100
Ok Paul Well , Opera and Mark's systems are not the same , Opera is recovering data , with afc/fec , and the DS , devised by Marcus , is correlating the Opera encoded data pattern and requires high s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-03/msg00370.html (13,151 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu