Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial

from [Paul Nicholson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 17:58:58 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <88E80A9EE32242878B4B3862799345DC@AGB>
References: <[email protected]> <0D96F865B192468488683DA4C54DAACE@AGB>,<C984CED5D52A42868966D7819B024C49@AGB> <[email protected]> <BBA7AE8F0A714C24A3509FC44BE8D781@AGB> <[email protected]> <88E80A9EE32242878B4B3862799345DC@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 

Thanks for that Graham.

I'm just trying to see how far short we are of an opera decode.

I just got another 0.84 dB S/N improvement by shifting the loop
a little further from the prevailing noise, and by compensating
for the slight elliptical polarisation of the signal.

Markus reported:

> 2014-03-07 06:51:53 ... -48.9dBOp 100% 19.4dB

so I guess that would now be -48.1dBOp.

But still 2 or 3dB short I think?

--
Paul Nicholson
--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Markus Vester
Next by Date:  Re: LF: OP2H to continue tonight..., Graham
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Graham
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]