To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 08 Mar 2014 17:58:58 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <88E80A9EE32242878B4B3862799345DC@AGB> |
References: | <[email protected]> <0D96F865B192468488683DA4C54DAACE@AGB>,<C984CED5D52A42868966D7819B024C49@AGB> <[email protected]> <BBA7AE8F0A714C24A3509FC44BE8D781@AGB> <[email protected]> <88E80A9EE32242878B4B3862799345DC@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Thanks for that Graham. I'm just trying to see how far short we are of an opera decode. I just got another 0.84 dB S/N improvement by shifting the loop a little further from the prevailing noise, and by compensating for the slight elliptical polarisation of the signal. Markus reported: > 2014-03-07 06:51:53 ... -48.9dBOp 100% 19.4dB so I guess that would now be -48.1dBOp. But still 2 or 3dB short I think? -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: OP2H to continue tonight..., Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 27.925 is correct dial, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |