Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+17\s+or\s+19\s+or\s+21\s+inch\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+17\s+or\s+19\s+or\s+21\s+inch\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 17 or 19 or 21 inch? (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:17:14 -0400; I vote for small. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00147.html (8,498 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 17 or 19 or 21 inch? (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:50:49 +0100; I vote for small. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00274.html (10,076 bytes)
3. LF: 17 or 19 or 21 inch? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:29:06 +0200; LF, VLF, Would like to hear some opinions about the best width of a grabber window. Currently all my windows are optimised for a xxx*1024 pixel monitor. This is suitable for the most monitors. But si; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00608.html (8,846 bytes)
4. Re: LF: 17 or 19 or 21 inch? (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:34:05 -0400 (EDT); Hi Stefan, small is beautiful - I'd say please leave it as it is! Especially when I'm outdoors with the little netbook, I just hate having to scroll around laterally to see the latest pixels appear o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00708.html (10,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]