Hi Andy calculation in WSJT / WSPR gives an artificially high S/N value if the input bandwidth is restricted below >a complete 2.5kHz's worth, and if impulsive noise is present. So could ROS be suffe
A thought. MF1 ROS is one symbol per second isn't it. If you can decode at -33dB (presumably in the reference bandwidth of 2.5kHz) that's -1dB S/N in a symbol bandwidth. Which I'm not sure I can
Hi LF, Running ROS MF-1 beacon again tonight with a little more power to the antenna producing 150mW ERP approx. Last night was 100mW ERP approx. Frequency is 137.500 kHz (dial 136.500 kHz USB) Repor
Hi LF, Running ROS MF-1 beacon again tonight with a little more power to the antenna producing 100mW ERP approx. First few frames will be at 50mW ERP then increase to the above level. Frequency is 13
Hi LF, My ROS MF-1 beacon is transmitting now with 3 minute timer. Frequency is 137.500 kHz (dial 136.500 kHz USB), reports & QSO attempts very welcome. ERP about 50mW. 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83QO
Gary, Just a couple of db's short of a decode via the web , -36 is going some though http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/ RX1: 21:55 @ 13.8 Hz: *[:]V-KFY:32DM5#("")EM3H#/F[_ <CANCEL> -36 dB G .. From:
That would trigger the email report .. qra , would add the range as well ! Q What antenna system do you use on 137 ? G .. Hi Gary, RX1: 17:27 @ -3.8 Hz: G4WGT <STOP> -33 dB RX1: 17:32 @ -3.3 Hz: G4WG
Tnx Eddie, I was setting up to see if i could monitor Willem. could see him via twente but he was running mf-7 , which is not as sensitive as mf-1 , that was a test at 100 watts , decoded that via tw
I am monitoring 502kHz ROS MF1 Eddie G3ZJO --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graham Sent: 02 July 2010 13:33 To: r
Reply from R . MF1 ROS is 0.837053 symbols/second. If you can decode at -33dB (presumably in the reference bandwidth of 2.5kHz) that's +1.7 dB S/N in a symbol bandwidth, that in the case of 16FSK wit
Hi Michel, Thank you for your report. I will send a longer message with e-mail for a little while. 73 Gary - G4WGT On 1 July 2010 19:00, Michel F5WK <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Gary, RX1: 17:27 @ -
Andy, I guess it is the same SNR issue that has been noticed with WSPR. As you mentioned SNR is calculated for SSB bandwidth. If some uses a narrow filter the calculated SNR is too low. If I remember